| "Democracy is not just a means to an end. Democracy is a value in itself. And if we treasure that value, we need to provide a more democratic system for the centrepiece of our own political structure." - Robin Cook, 2005 |
LCER is a network of Labour Party members and supporters campaigning for the Labour Party to support a more proportional voting system.
We believe the current voting system ("First Past the Post") is unfair, outdated and not fit for purpose. We want to see FPTP replaced with a voting system in which everyone’s vote counts, seats are allocated broadly in proportion to the votes cast, and the link is maintained between MPs and their constituents. |   |
LCER'S Annual General Meeting will take place on 4th February 20204 February 2020, 6.30-8.30pm |
LABOUR PARTY LEADERSHIP ELECTIONFollowing the close of nominations on 13 December, we've written to all the candidates for the Leadership and Deputy Leadership, to ask where they stand on voting reform. We'll bring you their responses as they come in. On this page you will ONLY find formal statements made by the candidates in the course of the leadership election. You can read more about what the candidates have previously said about voting reform on Make Votes Matter's website.
REBECCA LONG BAILEY No formal statement yet
LISA NANDY No formal statement yet  KEIR STARMER No formal statement yet
EMILY THORNBERRY No formal statement yet |
| LCER IS RECRUITING!After the 2019 election, the arguments for proportional representation are more compelling than ever. First Past the Post has handed Boris Johnson a huge parliamentary majority, on well under half the popular vote. Labour members and supporters must come together to ensure we replace this corrupt voting system. Stand up and be counted - join LCER today! |
2019 election: What would the result have been under PR? | It isn't possible to say exactly what the result would have been under PR, and beware of anyone who tells you otherwise! Voting patterns would be different under PR: turnout would most likely be higher if everyone's vote counted, and almost everyone would vote according to their conviction rather than tactically. But one thing is absolutely clear: the Conservatives would not have won an 86-seat majority under a fair voting system. The graphic below, from Channel 4's FactCheck report, shows how Parliament might look under PR, assuming that everyone voted as they did on December 12. |
|
John McDonnell calls | follow lcer | LCER blog posts
|
READ our report: | invite a speakerfor your CLP or Trade Union meeting
| We have a panel of speakers who are available to attend meetings all over the country. If you would like to spark a discussion at a meeting of your local Labour Party or Trade Union, please contact us. "I just wanted to let you know that our recent session on voting reform was one of the best debates we've had all year. The speaker was incredibly engaging and knowledgeable, and many members have told me how much they learned." CLP secretary, Eastern Region |
SUPPORT THE CAMPAIGN FOR PROPORTIONAL REPRESENTATION! |
VIDEOS ON |  |  |
What's wrong with Under FPTP, people living in safe seats know their vote will never make any difference - the election always hangs on a few voters in marginal seats. That's just plain wrong. | Are other voting systems any better than FPTP? Across the world, most countries hold elections using proportional voting systems. Even in the UK, we use PR for elections to our Regional and London Assemblies. | Why must Labour take the lead on voting reform? The Tories will never change the voting system - FPTP gives an inbuilt advantage to right-wing parties, because Labour voters tend to be concentrated in urban areas. |
